Citizens Property Insurance Board Approves Rate Hike – CBS Miami

TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/NSF) – Clients of Citizens Property Insurance Corp. will receive a larger rate hike than initially proposed, following an amendment to a state law that was partially blocked by a federal judge this week.

Citizens’ officials expressed disappointment at Sunday’s ruling, in which U.S. district chief judge Mark Walker found that the new law, passed by lawmakers this spring, violated roofers’ right to speech.

READ MORE: Florida sees spike in COVID cases, FIU’s infectious disease expert Dr. Aileen Marty said delta variant is a big concern

But the Burgers board of directors used another part of the measure (SB 76) during a meeting on Wednesday to approve new tariff changes.

“These necessary adjustments reflect the efforts of the Florida legislature to return Citizens to its role as a residual insurance company,” Citizens chairman Carlos Beruff said in a press release following Wednesday’s action. “Unfortunately, we have become the first choice, or only choice, in too many regions of the state.”

Described as an amendment to increases previously approved in February, the changes mean that the average rate increase for new and renewal policies after August 1, will be 2.3 percent, while renewals after February 1, 2022 will increase by 7.6 percent.

The increases vary by location and are subject to approval by the Insurance Board.

The new statute, which went into effect on July 1, partially changed a 2011 law that capped annual increases for Citizens customers to 10 percent, meaning many have not paid actuarially correct rates.

The law, signed last month by Governor Ron DeSantis, also allows citizens to factor additional reinsurance cost estimates when calculating rates.

Gale Force Roofing & Restoration LLC of Brandon filed a lawsuit last month against the new statute, arguing that a provision prohibiting roofers from advertising is unconstitutional.

Walker sided with the roofing company and issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of parts of the law. The judge ruled that the new law violates First Amendment rights by directly punishing protected speech.

Walker’s ruling targeted a section of the law that prevents contractors from soliciting homeowners to file insurance claims through a “banned ad,” including emails, door hangers, flyers and pamphlets.

“It is also clear that Plaintiff’s imminent injury by prohibiting Plaintiff’s truthful commercial speech outweighs the State’s interest in preventing fraud, protecting consumers from exploitation and stabilizing the insurance market.” Walker wrote in the statement.

Lawmakers passed the insurance measure on April 30, amid rising property insurance rates and insurers dropping policies in Florida.

Citizens President and CEO Barry Gilway said he was “not surprised, but disappointed” with Walker’s ruling.

“I understand the logic behind the order,” Gilway said. “But the bottom line is that, in my view, the hiring rate is significantly driven by the recruitment and aggressive solicitation of claims.”

The new law also takes steps to limit attorney fees and shorten the time to file claims.

READ MORE: Homeland Security warns of South Florida skippers planning to join flotilla to Cuba

The statute is seen as a second recent legislative victory for citizens and the insurance industry.

In 2019, lawmakers imposed restrictions on policyholders from transferring claims — known as an allocation of benefits — to contractors, who then pursue payment from insurers. Still, rates are going up and policies are accelerating from private hands to state-backed citizens.

This year’s law raises the 10 percent limit on annual premium increases by 1 percent per year over the next five years to make state-backed insurer rates more competitive with private insurance coverage. The law also requires citizens to factor in the reinsurance costs necessary to protect the surplus against a 1 in 100 year storm in their rates and send policyholders to private insurance companies if a private policy premium is within 20 percent of a comparable citizen policy premium. lies .

Citizenship officials noted on Wednesday that state lawmakers could discuss Walker’s ruling during the 2022 legislative session starting in January. However, they acknowledged that any positive signs that other parts of the law are working as intended will not be noticeable until later in 2022.

“I know we’ll have data, hopefully in the next year or so, to really understand its impact on the incoming barrage of lawsuits that we’re seeing,” said Christine Ashburn, head of communications, law and external affairs for the citizen.

In the lawsuit, Gale Force Roofing and Restoration said it is advertising homeowners to contact the company for storm damage roof inspections.

“Plaintiff (Gale Force Roofing and Restoration) will then truthfully convey the nature and extent of the damage to homeowners,” the lawsuit said. Plaintiff will then encourage homeowners to contact their insurance company to make a claim under their home insurance policy and perform a contract with the claimant to provide the claimant with the benefits available under the homeowner’s insurance policy. to point.”

Gale Force argued that the law cools his First Amendment rights because it forces the company to stop its written advertisements encouraging consumers to contact the company for the purpose of making an insurance claim for roof damage.

The company also argued that the new law is more about reducing insurance claims than preventing fraud, saying the statute serves as a “thinly veiled effort” to prevent homeowners from getting outside help in filing valid insurance claims. for home repairs.

However, supporters of the bill and insurance industry officials argued that questionable, if not fraudulent, roof damage claims have played a major role in driving up costs.

In court documents, attorneys representing the state disputed that the law’s restrictions violate the rights of the First Amendment, arguing that the “prohibited advertising” provision should be considered a reasonable restriction on commercial expressions to combat exploitation and fraud. consumers.

But Walker disagreed.

While the state has the right to regulate contractors and protect Floridians from fraud, Walker wrote in Sunday’s order, “it must do so within the limits set by the Constitution.”

“Here, the legislature has not done so accordingly,” the judge added.

MORE NEWS: ‘Niño’s for Cuba’ rally Sunday in Tropical Park

(©2021 CBS Local Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. The News Service of Florida Jim Turner contributed to this report.)

Comments are closed.